A critique of the book blood and belonging by michael ignatieff

This paper will explain the subject of the book and its relevance, discuss Michael Ignatieff's methods and conclusions on the subject and finally include a personal critique of the book by the author of this paper. The author of the book travels on what he terms "the six journeys. He examines the unique expression of nationalism that each populace displays by interviewing various members of that particular society.

A critique of the book blood and belonging by michael ignatieff

Blood and Belonging, by Michael Ignatieff You are here: He examines the unique expression of nationalism that each populace displays by interviewing various members of that particular society.

The six areas that he travels to are specifically chosen for the clarity which nationalism is expressed in society. Nationalism is a factor contributing toward both present possible future instability in these areas. According to Ignatieff, in Croatia and Serbia there is a desire for a separate identity between the two nations.

A terror so strong and historically persistent, it has driven people to a desperate state to do anything. This is a large contributor to the reasons for the extreme violence present there today.

A Serb is someone who is not a Croat.

A critique of the book blood and belonging by michael ignatieff

In his travels in Germany, the author points out an important question. Does the nation make the state, or the state the nation? This question by far does not stop here, especially when Germany is the subject. The essence of the German people is seen by some as aggressive and offensive, thus the existence of the German problem.

If the nation makes the state then Germany will always be a threat. If the state makes the nation, then the aggressive nature of the German nation, which lead the world into two global wars, can be harnessed and redirected.

The question has its roots and answers in the recent reunification of Germany. The Ukraine is concerned with not being Russian. It is here Ignatieff receives a complete vision of what nationalism is.

Ignatieff uses the example of Quebec to illustrate the relationship between nationalism and federalism. The Kurds represent a nation without a state, who find themselves surrounded by other nations who are more aggressive nationalists. The term Kurdistan is a definition of the areas used by Ignatieff to explain the area of major Kurdish populace concentration.

There is no real borders, no flag, no government and Kurds must acknowledge the state in which they reside i. Finally, the sixth journey ends in Northern Ireland. He makes the observation that this is the ideal place to conclude his project. Northern Ireland contains a recurrence of the themes that seemed so prevalent in the other journeys.

In Ireland ethnicity, religion and politics are all bound into one expression or identity. These are also evident in the five previous studies. The answer to this question is, yes it is. The issue is important. Nationalism presents itself as a phenomenon.

A critique of the book blood and belonging by michael ignatieff

The questions of why people need to retain a cultural identity and the way they go about preserving it is still unanswerable.

The very existence of the enigma created by nationalism dictates the need to explore the subject in more depth.Essay This is a critique of the book, Blood and Belonging, by Michael Ignatieff.

This paper will explain the subject of the book and its relevance, discuss Michael Ignatieff's methods and conclusions on the subject and finally include a personal critique of the book by the author of this paper.

Michael Ignatieff is a frequent contributor to The New Yorker and The New York Review of Books, among other publications, and the author of many acclaimed books, including Isaiah Berlin, The Warrior's Honor, The Russian Album, and The Needs of Strangers.

He lives in Cambridge, Massachusetts. This is a critique of the book, Blood and Belonging, by Michael Ignatieff. This paper will explain the subject of the book and its relevance, discuss Michael Ignatieff's methods and conclusions on the.

There are two kinds of contemporary nationalism, says Ignatieff, ``civic'' and ``ethnic,'' the first based on a common perception of shared law, and the second--derived from the German romantics--based on blood kinship. In conclusion, the subject of the book, Blood and Belonging, has been discussed.

The relevance of the book’s theme was examined along with the authors methods and style of writing. This critique also addressed the conclusions drawn by Michael Ignatieff concerning nationalism and its expressions in the world. This is a critique of the book, Blood and Belonging, by Michael Ignatieff.

This paper will explain the subject of the book and its relevance, discuss Michael Ignatieff.

Peace Magazine v10n4p Blood & belonging: journeys into the new nationalism