Print Advertisement In an era of changing climate and sinking economies, Malthusian limits to growth are back—and squeezing us painfully. Whereas more people once meant more ingenuity, more talent and more innovation, today it just seems to mean less for each.
Population control is the practice of artificially maintaining the size of any population. It typically refers to the act of limiting the size of an animal population so that it remains manageable, as opposed to the act of protecting a species from excessive rates of extinction. Population Control Population growth, a topic most likely insignificant to the common man, but the world’s population growth and control of that population growth is necessary for our overall survival. The issue has been discussed due to fear of the world becoming overpopulated. Nov 29, · Best Answer: No. Population control of "the new world order" is not necessary as you can already see 'famine' is a form of population control, in some countries of the world it is already stabilising the population in those countries. You might say the well off countries should give more food to those Status: Resolved.
Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues. Get Access Is population control necessary?
Essay Sample Recently, I saw a documentary which featured the problems of overpopulation in The Third World countries. This is necessary because we live on the same planet and share the same resources, both renewable and non-renewable.
Population control is defined as the systematic regulating of the number of people in any given country to redress the problems of overpopulation and underpopulation. The methods vary from country to country, ranging from encouraging the use of contraceptives-to legalising abortion and providing incentives for government birth control policies in overpopulated regions, whereas in places with low or zero population growth, Intra-Vitro Fertilisation IVF programmes are introduced to reverse the decline.
Generally, overpopulation in a country gives rise to social evils such as overcrowding, unhygienic living environments, poverty and unemployment. At this point, it is only necessary that some population control measures be enforced. However, in the real world the answer is never really simple or definite.
One must always consider the political, social and economic consequences of population control. China and India will make good case studies as they are the two most populated countries in the world. In India, the human population has hit almost a billion. Although the country is rich in natural resources and its military technology is on par with Superpower nations like America or Russia, to date it is still, considered a third world country because a majority of its population lives within the poverty belt.
Given this dire situation, it seems imperative that drastic population controls should be exercised. The Chinese government has predicted that their economy cannot cope with overpopulation. However, since most traditional Chinese families prefer sons to daughters, it has led to numerous tragic instances of parents killing their girls in the hope that the next child will be a boy.
Whatever it is, infanticide cannot be condoned as a means to population control. Another point is that population control that brings desirable consequences in the beginning may backfire in the long run.
For instance, during the 70s in Singapore, the government furiously campaigned for couples to stop at two.
Later, this idea became deeply entrenched; that today, we are facing the problem of a greying population. Since our economy depends on its human resource for growth, this can be a serious threat.
Currently, the government has reversed its policy to encourage couples who are financially stable to have more than two children.
In conclusion, I believe that population control is often necessary. However, trying to control a large percentage of the human population is a complicated process and often has unforeseeable consequences.
As such, any government should proceed with caution.No, population control is not necessary. There are enough resources for everyone.
We need to do the following instead: 1. Ensure fair distribution of resources. 2. Encourage efficiency and discourage waste. 3. Help people to produce more then consume.
4. Spread over unused land. Population control is defined as the systematic regulating of the number of people in any given country to redress the problems of overpopulation and underpopulation.
“Hunting is necessary for population control.” This is the main defense from the hunting establishment that the public has come to widely believe. This false narrative frame hunting, not as sport or leisure, but as essential conservation work, based on an appeal to . Population control is rooted in the idea that the world’s population is increasing too rapidly and is outstripping natural resources.
“ We must speak far more clearly about sexuality, contraception, about abortion, about values that control population, because the ecological crisis, in short, is the population .
It is extremely necessary to control the growth of population and the importance of population control are as described below: First and foremost, the control in the rate of population growth is important for the prevention of shortage of food. Most of the people are below the poverty line and they live a life which is not worth living.
It is projected that the world population would rise to around 9 billion by the year Population stabilization is essay on population control is necessary necessary ingredient of any.